• Blog Home
  • About Us
  • “Spotlight”
  • Non-Public Schools
    • Charter Schools
    • Private Schools
    • Home Schooling
  • SWW School Districts
    • School Boards
      • Evergreen
      • Vancouver
      • Battle Ground
        • BG School Board
      • Ridgefield
      • LaCenter
      • Camas
      • Green Mountain
      • Hockinson
      • Washougal
  • Legislation
    • WA State Legislation
    • Federal Legislation
    • Other Legislation
  • General
    • Common Core
      • ELA
      • Math
      • Testing
      • Opt-Out
      • References
      • CC Groups & Organizations
    • WAKids
    • ESSA/ESEA
    • Privacy & Data
    • Social Emotional Learning (S.E.L.)
    • PBIS
  • Archives
    • 2020 OSPI Election Archive
      • 2020 OSPI Race
        • Maia Espinoza
        • Chris Reykdal
      • Ron Higgins
      • David Spring – Superintendent of Public School Candidate 2020
    • Washington State School Funding – Post McCleary
    • 2018 Elections
      • 3rd Congressional
      • 17th Legislative
      • 18th Legislative
      • 49th Legislative
    • 2017 School Board Elections – SWW
      • Woodland School Board
      • Washougal School Board
      • Camas School Board
      • Evergreen School Board
      • Vancouver School Board
      • Hockinson School Board
      • Battle Ground School Board
      • Green Mountain School Board
      • LaCenter School Board
      • Ridgefield School Board
    • WA 2016 Elections
      • Education Questions for 2016 Election
      • WA State Superintendent of Public Instruction
      • Governor
      • WA State Lt. Governor
      • WA State House – District 17
      • WA State Senate – District 17
      • WA State House – District 18
      • WA State Senate – District 18
      • WA State House – District 49
      • WA State Senate – District 49
      • US House – 3rd District
      • US Senate – Washington
    • Battle Ground Bond – April 24, 2018
    • Feb 2018 Battle Ground Capital Bond
    • Evergreen Feb 2018 Capital Bond
  • Resources
  • Polls
  • Contact

Southwest Washington Education (K-12)

"The past was erased, the erasure was forgotten, the lie became the truth." - George Orwell

You are here: Home / Computers / Battle Ground SD: 7th Graders: Giving out computers

December 21, 2016 By Admin1 Leave a Comment

Battle Ground SD: 7th Graders: Giving out computers

The Battle Ground School District is getting ready to start rolling out Chrome book laptops to 7th grade students as a pilot program.

At a recent School Board meeting the head of IT for the district gave a presentation to the Board on the plan. As a follow-up we reached out to him as well as one of the Assistant Superintendents and asked a series of questions. The exact email exchange is shown below if you want to read it. For those of you who want a synopsis here it is:

  • If they roll out computers to grades 3-12 that should equal ~11,000 students at a cost of ~$212 per unit (in 2016 dollars). This would work out to about $2.33 million. The 7th grade “test” will cost ~$88,000.
  • There will be a “fee” per laptop (declining with multiple students in a family household) as “insurance” – the fee is not yet defined and is optional
  • The actual choice of use is up to each teacher – there is no district policy

Thoughts/Questions:

  • While computers have lots of potential positive uses they are not the answer to education improvement
  • Is “equity” a sound reason to provide computers to everyone?
  • Studies show that computers can actually harm the educational experience (stay tuned for a blog story on this topic)
  • Is this a good use of funds?
  • Please reach out to us and/or the district with your questions so we can all learn

1) Why use 7th graders as a the roll-out population?

For the pilot, we need to start small. We chose middle schools because it allows us to work with fewer teachers than we would in a high school. We also wanted our pilot group to include the teacher/trainers in those buildings, so that led us to the 7th grade. These teachers are already trained to provide professional development with technology, so their presence benefits the program.

2) How many students do you expect to participate? (Number of students; # of teachers; # of schools and what portion of an IT support FTE?)

We are working with 17 teachers in the 3 middle schools: Pleasant Valley Middle School, Tukes Valley Middle School, and Amboy Middle School. Based on the last enrollment numbers I saw, the pilot will include 416 students, though this number could fluctuate up and down by a few students prior to 2nd semester. We are not adding IT support for this pilot (see the response to #11).

3) Will students and parents be notified ahead of the roll-out and if so how far ahead? Will they be given the opportunity to “opt-out” and not participate? If they do “opt-out” what are the implications?

Phone calls went out to parents of 7th graders last night and parent outreach nights are scheduled for after Thanksgiving. Parents will receive information about the program and the optional assurance plan at that time. If parents choose to opt out, their student would still have access to technology in the classroom.

4) Exactly what will the Chromebooks be used for in the classroom? If students do not participate will that affect their ability to learn/participate in class? What if they forget their unit but need it for class? Will there be “loaners” or other alternatives?

The chromebooks we are assigning to students will be used for the same types of activities that students are already doing with the chromebooks we have in schools. We have carts of chromebooks at every school already, so use of these tools is not new to the students or the teachers. There will be access to devices for the times when items are forgotten.

5) When will final details about the “coverage” program be available?

The form is being finalized now. Information will be ready prior to the parent outreach night.

6) Will students be allowed to use their own personal unit in place of the Chromebook (I think you said no)? If not can you summarize the reasons why?

Use of personal devices prevents the district from managing and supervising access on the device. The web filtering in use by the district will not work on personal devices outside the district and we have no ability to manage the system with the tools I mentioned in the board meeting.

7) Will you monitor all activities on the Chromebook? Email? Web browser? Can they watch YouTube? Use Twitter, Snapchat and other such services? Will there be reporting (and to who and who sees/reviews the data/reports) post fact or real time or? Will the students and parents be apprised of the details of what will be seen? Who will have access to the data gathered?

Student filtering is already in place and is required by the federal government to participate in erate, a funding tool in use to help offset the costs of telecommunications. This requirement has been in place from the inception of the program, which I believe was 1997. Battle Ground Schools has had web filtering in place since before I started with the district 17 years ago. There are far too many services to list as blocked or allowed but we do not allow Snapchat, Twitter or Facebook, as well as many others. Youtube is open to students in middle and high school due to the enormous amount of excellent educational content on that service. This access is forced into a “restricted” mode, which curtails much of the content that we do not need access to, similar to a “Safe Search” option in many search engines. There is no way any organization could manage or see what is happening in real time. There is simply too much. Similarly, providing reports on everything would also be unmanageable for any school. We do have a tool in place that allows the teacher visibility into what students are doing in Google including email, web, blogging, etc. The teacher can also see what students are doing in real time, and the teacher has controls to take screenshots of what students are doing and can control the sites a student is on. Last, we provide professional development to staff on topics dealing with the safe and responsible use of technology.

8) Are there written guidelines/training on acceptable and unacceptable behaviors and the consequences of deviations?

There has been an acceptable use policy and procedure in place since the district had access to the Internet, which precedes my time here. Please see Policy and Procedure 2022/P on the district’s website. You may also want to see Policy and Procedure 3207/P for the information on Cyberbullying, Intimidation and Harassment and 3241/P Classroom Management, Corrective Action/Punishment.

9) What if students don’t charge the laptops? Will there be recharging or other support services in each classroom?

Yes, there will be locations in each classroom for charging devices.

10) Can the students be able to download and install software and I so from where and how do you control/monitor and take action if/as needed? Can they play games?

Chromebooks do not install software like a Windows or Mac computer. There are apps and extensions, most of which are “pushed” by the district.

11) How much time/effort do you see support (teachers or IT or others) being needed to train and maintain?

We have been providing technology professional development since I first started, and we have ramped up considerably in the past 5 years. We have a ed tech coordinator who provides workshops throughout the year and also visits classrooms for one on one teacher coaching. There are also teachers in each classroom who provide training as well. We are working with teachers during two all day workshops and one collaboration day per week. Teachers then collaborate through the week before coming back to meet with us. These sessions are roughly 45 minutes in length.

IT support for Chromebooks is minimal. They arrive ready to distribute and update automatically. We keep them set to the ChromeOS version that is supported by all of our different online tools, typically one version back. This is a simple setting on an IT admin panel, so it takes perhaps 5 minutes for the district to update all the Chromebooks. Hardware support is minimal – we have seen very little physical damage to the devices. Overall, if I had to provide an estimate of the percentage of our time that it takes to support Chromebooks, I would say 1-2%. The support needs for just the pilot group would be impossible to guess, but perhaps a small fraction of 1%? Again, there isn’t much that can happen to these computers. They simply do not behave the way a laptop, desktop, or iPad do.

One final question: Who’s the champion for the 1:1 rollout? Is a board driven or superintendent or you? Who’s approval did it require and is it the same process for other grades? If this is successful what is the rollout progression and timing?

I am not sure any one person could be said to have been the sole champion of the plan.  As a district, we have been purchasing chromebooks for 5 years so we know what it looks like to have technologically integrated classrooms.  The board and superintendents have always been supportive of technology in the district.  I took input from two different groups of staff and admin last year, the Technology Advisory Committee and a special committee to consider the viability of a 1:1 program.  What we found was that issuing chromebooks to each student instead of trying to add a full cart to each classroom was less expensive and guaranteed a greater level of equity between students.  Providing access that is always ready gives us the added benefit of having the tools students need to succeed, just as we would have paper, pencils and textbooks.
All purchases require superintendent and board approval.  If successful, the expansion of the program to other grades would be the same.  The rollout progression would tentatively be:

2017-2018 – grades 7 – 8 2018-2019 – grades 6 – 9 2019-2020 – grades 5 – 10 2020-2021 – grades 4 – 11 2021-2022 – grades 3 – 12

Again, this timeline is tentative depending on many different factors.

This follow up question was posed to one of the Assistant Superintendents:

Exactly what do/will the 7th graders use the Chromebooks for? I would like a comprehensive list of uses so I can understand the value. Appreciate your assistance in getting the details. I’m happy to meet with one or more of the 7th grade teachers and ask them if that’s preferred.

You are right, in that this is an “open” question.  The uses of the Chromebooks are as diverse as the imagination and creativity of the teachers who use them and shaped by the training we provide for them. By using technology we are  meeting our students part way in a world that many of them already are very comfortable and engaged in.
That being said our goal is not to have Chromebooks “replace” pencil and paper but to become an additional resource for our teachers to use to engage students in their learning that cannot be done with traditional methods of lecture and teacher directed instruction.
Here is just a small sample of what I have seen Chromebooks being used for:
A classroom of behaviorally challenged students were actively engaged in a simulation game on the Chromebooks that had them answering questions from a history lesson. They were given points and incentives to work in teams and challenge each other with high level questions. With his computer the teacher could monitor each students’ progress and make sure they were participating.
A seventh grade language arts class was writing an analysis of a non-fiction writing piece they had read on their Chromebooks. Using google classroom they could instantly share their writing with the teacher for edits and with other students for peer editing. The students did not have to wait to turn in a “draft” of a paper but could get instant feedback and move on at their own rate.
In a math class students worked in groups and shared their thinking for solving a problem by showing their work from the Chromebook onto the Smart Board in front of the room. The class as a whole could then discuss each groups solution. Students could seamlessly switch back and forth to their work and use Excel to plug in formulas and solve equations.
I have seen virtual science lessons, students engineering working models in a fabrication lab from their computer designs, health lessons where students track their heart rate and blood pressure, historical research done in a classroom so students did not have to waste valuable classroom transition time going to a library and the list goes on.
I cannot give you a comprehensive list because it is only limited by the restrictions our teachers have with their own learning curve which we are working hard to diminish.
The final question posed back to the IT group and their response: (the question focused on identifying exactly what computers are used for in the classroom and how the lack of use might negatively impact a student)
My apologies if you thought I was unable to answer your question.  I had a response that I may not have sent.  This is what I had written:

There have been a series of articles and videos that provide information as to the use of the technology we have implemented.  I spoke to some of these uses at the board meeting, so they would be in the minutes.  The articles are here:

 

http://www.battlegroundps.org/blog/schooladministratorstakebgpstechstrategybacktocaribbean

http://www.battlegroundps.org/blog/yacoltteachersreachforchromebookstoteachreading
 

http://www.battlegroundps.org/blog/chromebooksagamechangerforbgps

http://www.battlegroundps.org/blog/bgpspreparesstudentsforonlineassessments

The Innovative Ed videos can be found on the district’s YouTubechannel here.
The problem with trying to fulfill your request is that there is no such thing as a comprehensive list to uses.  The examples that Mark provided are excellent and an indication of the great capabilities that technology provides our students.  I could gather a multitude of other examples but this still would not capture the potential this give us.  Some of these can be seen in the video series I mentioned above – Innovative Ed. You can view these on the district’s Youtube channel.
In my board presentation and previous emails, I spoke about some of the general possibilities.  These include:
  • Student and teacher collaboration in Google Apps
  • Peer editing
  • Comparison and analysis of various types of media
  • Student communication using email, web, blogging
  • Publishing student work online
  • Accessing digital content such as video, audio, text including online access to textbooks
  • Coding and programming
  • Interactive resources such as virtual tours or simulations
  • Google Classroom for managing assignments
  • Differentiated instruction to allow students to work a level appropriate to them
  • Connecting with other classrooms
As Mark mentioned, the Chromebook is not a replacement for pencil and paper or for textbooks.  It is simply another tool that students need for learning.  I hope some of this helps with your questions.  If there is anything else, please let me know.

Filed Under: Computers, Education, Learning Tagged With: Battle Ground School District, chrome book, computers, education, IY, students, teachers

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Categories

  • 4 Day School Week (1)
  • Abuse (1)
  • Addiction (4)
  • AI (3)
  • Battle Ground (24)
  • Bonds (47)
  • Book Review (4)
  • Camas School District (18)
  • Cartoons (11)
  • Censorship (1)
  • Charter Schools (18)
  • ChatGPT (2)
  • Classrooms (9)
  • Climate Change (1)
  • College (1)
  • Common Core (223)
  • Comparisons (51)
  • Competency Based Education (4)
  • Computers (24)
  • Control of Education (196)
  • Covid (9)
  • Creativity (6)
  • Critical Race Theory (10)
  • CSE (2)
  • Data (63)
  • DEI (3)
  • Deniers (2)
  • Disabilities (1)
  • Discipline (6)
  • Discrimination (11)
  • District (25)
  • DoE (1)
  • Education (198)
  • Elections (7)
  • Enrollment (1)
  • Equity and Equality (14)
  • Equity/Equality (16)
  • ESEA (7)
  • ESSA (32)
  • Evergreen SD (13)
  • Federal (17)
  • FLASH (9)
  • Funding (71)
  • Games (2)
  • Gender (25)
  • General (29)
  • Gifted (3)
  • Grading (3)
  • Grit (4)
  • Hand Writing (1)
  • Health (21)
  • Hockinson (12)
  • Homeschooling (38)
  • Humor (1)
  • Individuality (27)
  • Indoctrination (2)
  • Jobs (9)
  • Kindergarten (23)
  • KNOW (3)
  • LaCenter SD (5)
  • Laws (7)
  • Learning (85)
  • Learning Pods (1)
  • Legal (4)
  • Legislation (35)
  • Levys (55)
  • LGBTQ (5)
  • Local (16)
  • Math (35)
  • McCleary (3)
  • Mental Health (27)
  • Micro Schools (1)
  • Money (37)
  • Music (1)
  • NEA (2)
  • Nutrition (1)
  • OBE (1)
  • Opt-Out (15)
  • OSPI (38)
  • Parents (23)
  • PBIS (2)
  • PDC (1)
  • Personal Pronouns (2)
  • Phonics (1)
  • Play (2)
  • Policy (18)
  • Politics (22)
  • Poverty (1)
  • Pre-School (19)
  • Privacy (16)
  • Private Schools (6)
  • Project Based Learning (PBL) (1)
  • Pronouns (1)
  • Public Schools (50)
  • Puzzles (2)
  • Quiz (1)
  • Reading (14)
  • Recess (2)
  • Resources (2)
  • Ridgefield (29)
  • Safety (9)
  • SBAC (44)
  • School Boards (50)
  • School Budgets (3)
  • school choice (20)
  • School Data Project (1)
  • Security (7)
  • Self identity (7)
  • Sexuality (30)
  • Social Emotional (27)
  • Social Justice (10)
  • Social Warriors (4)
  • Special Ed (2)
  • State (19)
  • Students (5)
  • Survey's (3)
  • Taxes (30)
  • Teachers (78)
  • Teaching (46)
  • Technology (51)
  • Testing (132)
  • U.S.P.I.E. (1)
  • Unions (18)
  • Unschooling (2)
  • USDOE (12)
  • VanSD (15)
  • Video (9)
  • Vocational (3)
  • Vouchers (11)
  • WAKids (4)
  • Washougal (11)
  • WEA (4)
  • Wokeness (4)
  • WoodlandSD (12)
  • Writing (1)
  • WSSDA (5)

Copyright © 2026 · Education Pro Theme On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in